The latest debate in the field is about whether or not embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable. As the name implies, embryonic stem cells come from embryos. Stem cells can be described as blank cells, which means that they have yet to be assigned a purpose; they can become any kind of cell.
Conclusion. Stem cell research is a hotly debated issue on Capitol Hill and likely will remain so in the coming years. However, federalism and the presence of wealthy donors have allowed several states and major academic institutions to bypass the NIH entirely and function independently ().Nevertheless, as Obama made clear on March 9, “(m)edical miracles do not happen simply by accident.
Embryonic stem cells has been of great importance in the drug testing field. Since stem cells can differentiate into many types of cells, a specific drug can be used to test for desired effect. For e.g. a drug can be used on lung cells rather than being used directly in the person’s body system.
In the case of embryonic stem cell research, it is impossible to respect both moral principles.To obtain embryonic stem cells, the early embryo has to be destroyed. This means destroying a potential human life. But embryonic stem cell research could lead to the discovery of new medical treatments that would alleviate the suffering of many people.
The fundamental issue of the beginning of human life appears to have created an unwarranted tension between science and religion when it comes to embryonic research. Argumentative essay examples. Advantages of using stem cells. The main benefit of stem cells is the ability to replace diseased or damaged cells in virtually every tissue of the body.
Steps have been taken to help stop embryonic stem cell research (although adult stem cell and cord cell research is widely supported). In 1995, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Dickey Amendment which prohibited all federal funding for research that resulted in the destruction of an embryo regardless of the source of that embryo.
The debate over federal funding of research involving fetuses and material derived from fetuses has ranged far and wide over the course of three decades. Its common thread, however, is an enduring controversy over work that is portrayed by its proponents as holding immense scientific promise and by its opponents as devaluing human life in its most basic form.
The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research is a solid contribution to our stem cell debates. Neither partisan nor committed to advocacy for any side, it displays epistemic honesty and exhibits the value of philosophical analysis at its best. (Ronald M. Green, Monash Bioethics Review).